There’s one forum post going round the Internet claiming to be a Phonenumbers4u Reveiw and suggests that Phonenumbers4u “rips off” clients this is 100% false and if you read the forum closely you’ll see the post is from a former Phonenumbers4u client whom purchased a SMS Chat service advertised it on Face Book, MySpace etc with NO cost per text or NO alternative contact details and NO age disclaimer (all of which are essential and required by premium rate regulator PhonepayPlus) and then considered it “unfair” that shut down the service upon finding it marketed in this way.

This was done for a number of reasons (1) Users would not have been aware of the cost per text and may have considered it free and therefore become upset when being charged £1.50 per text (2) The premium rate service would likely attract an investigation from the regulator and due to it’s delebarate attempt to mislead the public attract a fine of £500 - £1000 and so in the interest of all the service was disabled.

Should any readers of this post require further client comments or reviews on Phonenumbers4u’s service and rates are invited to visit: www.Premium-Rate-Gurus.co.uk/phonenumbers4u-reviews

It’s been a low few months for Switch Call Ltd and it’s customers since the administration process that began on the 15th December 2007 down to a “share holders dispute”.

This issue which could not be resolved has no doubt damaged Switch’s reputation from which Phonenumbers4u’s hopes is on the mend since the announcement last week that the company has been bought out of administraion and that business is set to return to normal within a matter of months with an array of additional services including Broadband and VOIP.

From what we’ve heard the company attracted a great deal of interest and the bidding came to a head between former share holders and directors Ian Conway and Nick Kalbauch and the another party (who eventually won the bidding due to it’s almost limitlesss reserve of cash). Although Switch will no longer be owned by the founders of the company many of the familuar faces are reported to stay on as employees.

Creditors (customers) look set to lose around 30% of their revenue due to the management dispute although an exact figure or payment date has still not been set.